Remote Pilots
Advice for RePL holders and recreational pilots responding to enquiries, interviews, infringement notices, licence action or prosecution.
Operating a drone commercially or recreationally is heavily regulated. When CASA or police allege that a drone has been misused, the consequences can include prosecution, infringement notices, suspension of a remote pilot licence, or action against a Remote Operator's Certificate.
Brindabella Legal assists remote pilots, operators and businesses to understand the allegation, preserve important evidence and respond in a way that protects their operational privileges, business and reputation.
Focused legal support for people and organisations facing drone-related allegations
Advice for RePL holders and recreational pilots responding to enquiries, interviews, infringement notices, licence action or prosecution.
Support where CASA is examining an operator's certificate, manuals, records, approvals, supervision or operational procedures.
Strategic advice where a drone incident or alleged breach creates regulatory, commercial and reputational risk for a business.
Part 101 investigations can arise from complaints, incidents, social media footage or surveillance by CASA or police.
Flying within controlled airspace without authorisation, flying above 400 feet AGL, or operating outside applicable airspace approvals.
Flying over a populous area, flying too close to people, vehicles or structures, or operating within 30 metres of people without appropriate controls.
Operating beyond visual line of sight without approval, or using automated flight modes where that operation is prohibited or not properly authorised.
Flying near fires, police, ambulance or other emergency operations where a drone may interfere with emergency response or safety.
Operating without a remote pilot licence, without a valid Remote Operator's Certificate, or outside the scope of a ReOC.
Failing to maintain required flight records, manuals or procedures, conduct risk assessments or complete pre-flight checks.
Operating a drone that CASA alleges was unsafe, unregistered, non-compliant or not fit for the flight being conducted.
Early decisions about records, interviews and written responses can shape the outcome.
CASA may request flight logs, manuals, operational records, telemetry, photographs, video footage or an explanation of the flight.
You may be asked to attend an interview, respond to alleged breaches of Part 101 of the CASR, or explain why action should not be taken.
Action may be proposed against your RePL or ReOC, or police may allege a criminal offence such as endangering safety.
CASA action can affect more than one flight. It may restrict a remote pilot's authority, change the scope of an operator's certificate, or disrupt an entire commercial operation.
Practical support through investigation, enforcement and review
We assess whether the alleged offence is supported by evidence, whether regulator powers were exercised lawfully and whether the investigation complies with procedural fairness.
We review flight logs, telemetry, photographs, video footage and operational records to identify material that supports or contradicts the allegation.
We draft responses to information requests, advise on interviews, manage communications with investigators and protect your rights at each step.
We prepare targeted submissions addressing the regulatory framework, evidence, operational context and proportionality of proposed action.
We address proposed suspension, cancellation, variation, conditions, operational limits, training requirements or surveillance measures.
We prepare evidence and submissions and represent clients in Administrative Review Tribunal proceedings or related prosecutions.
An adverse CASA decision may not be the end of the matter.
Seek reconsideration, correct factual errors, provide additional evidence and challenge findings that are incorrect, unfair or disproportionate.
Prepare the application, evidence, submissions and expert operational or technical material for conferences and hearings.
Early advice can prevent escalation and protect your operational privileges.
You are contacted about a drone flight, incident, complaint or alleged safety issue.
You receive a request for information, logs, manuals, operational records or an interview.
CASA alleges breaches of Part 101 of the CASR or asks why action should not be taken.
CASA proposes action against your RePL, your ReOC, operational approvals or operating conditions.
The allegation seems incorrect, unfair, disproportionate or unsupported by the evidence.
Aviation regulatory and prosecution experience applied to RPAS matters
Greg Williams has direct experience of aviation regulation, CASA enforcement and regulatory decision-making.
We assess the allegation against the flight evidence, regulator powers, operational context and review rights.
The response strategy focuses on reducing escalation and protecting your licence, business and reputation.
We provide clear practical guidance through a stressful process so each response is deliberate and defensible.